DOSIER

DOSIER

260701 01:12 I BELIEVE ONE SHOULD COLLECT OBSERVATIONS OF PERFIDY OVER THE YEARS AND DECADES AS ONE GOES ALONG IN THIS WORLD OF PERFIDY, THIS EARTH ON HELL, RUN BY DEVILS DRESSED IN SMILES.

01:19 SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME THE GOOD HAVE BEEN KILLED BY THE BAD.

01:43 The most amazing incident recently in USA is of course thecollapse of the U S Supreme Court in the case of Bush vs USA, in which Bush won, becoming the Usurper President.

070801 17:25 Today I started a new title (section) focusing on assembling people concerned about the failure of people assigned to fulfill the promises of service to citizens by government; it is called The Auxiliary League for Good Treatment.

120901 1959 The World Trade Center catastrophe might have occurred even with the best of precautions, but with the worst of precautions it was invited. We must always assume someone out there is out to get us, and try to enhance safety . But we do nothing of the sort. The officials take no responsibility; they are the playthings of lobbyists and the sheeplike stupidity of the masses. Precaution against skijacking in USA has been a joke. And people are stupid to stay in a building that has once been targeted, is an obvious target, is not prepared, and is subject to attack by jumbo-jets loaded with lots of fuel (what ever happened to the idea of non-exploding fuel?). The buildings were originally tested against plane crash, but with newer big planes it was known to be vulnerable as we saw. So why did it continue in use? The answers are obvious. But then why did that not cause tighter security for planes? Even if one wants to take a quick flight a short way, still the long haul big planes should have been treated to top security --- we may assume that the culprits rehearsed actually on our planes repeatedly without being challenged (thus sure it would work). If you lie down drunk in the middle of the street and are killed by a truck, it is your own fault. Punishing the culprit will not bring back the victim. The villain I blame is our own people who failed in their responsibility. Again smug loses. The lesson is, do not trust the establishment.

061001 2107 The warm response to Usurper´s speech to Congress etc, apropos Sept 11, would be touching if he were really President, and, ah yes, if those applauding could be respected for ratifying the Kyoto Agreement. I am reminded of Mark Twain´s sarcasm: there is a scale of value for human life based on what group one is in --- of course AMERICANS are worth far more than others, especially those who drown in floods USA fosters by global warming.

I admire President Clinton for many reasons, but cannot absolve him from responsibility in the matter of Sept 11. There is much he could have done, whichever way one slices it. As Reagan said in firing air-traffic controllers, the airline system is part of national defense --- accordingly a President has certain powers irrespective of Congress. Clinton could have by fiat placed covert Delta Force people on large planes; he could have like any general sought to anticipate the tricks of potential enemies, including the logic of their timing Sept 11 (first flights) etc; he could have coerced all and sundry by closing Reagan Airport; he could have, after first secretly conveying the view that USA was a sitting duck for terrorists, failing adequate cooperation (due to special interests myopic and venal), threatened to go public with names of the recalcitrant inside government and outside, in the meantime unavoidably letting the terrorists know there was a window of opportunity until the situation could get remedied --- and blaming the jerks. In other words, he should have taken no prisoners in the matter of security (let alone normal safety)(where are the radars not yet installed after lo these many years?). 22:50 As to the region including Afghanistan and Iraq, Clinton should have cleverly stopped the idiotic sanctions vs Saddam in their application upon civilians; as it played out, Saddam and his pals led USA down a merry path and succeeded in getting USA into a bad international image which we now see a menace (for whatever we do now will be seen as achieved by bin Laden). But some will justly point the finger of blame at The American People and Politics, which characteristically is a soft touch for any international Macchiavel, as nothing clever can be achieved by a nation the democracy of which consists of insidious blindly egotistical factions. Maybe now it will be permitted to look the american puerile in the face and say “Thou fool”. And not apologize before nightfall. Indeed, say “Thou hypocrite”. Where USA saw locations in Iraq potentially sources of unpermitted weapons, and where Saddam forbad inspection, such sites should have been listed and suddenly hit by many cruise missiles all at once. Any sanctions should have been dealt with as to civilians by directly delivering the necessary items to the proper rescipients. After all, the idea of sanctions, proposed before the Gulf War instead of armed conflict, was shown effete --- screw sanctions. 23:04 Remember that the long term aganda re Iraq, was to remodel the very idea of sovereignty --- sure it is the nation Iraq, but sovereignty is not a blank check; not for Iraq, nor any nation with regard to arms: USA and USSR formed agreements to limit arms; and no prospective Palestinian state could be conceived as not severely limitted as to arms and allegiances of arms. Similarly, the government of Iraq, as that those of Japan and Germany post WW2, should have been forced to behave according to OUR standards. But here we also recede back into the history of the first Bush mafia administration (represented amply in the current administration of Usurper) --- even considering the limits of the then coalition, a strong President (instead of a lackey of London) would have taken care of business properly; whereas Bush (as in Afghanistan) screwed everyone who wanted to be on our side, weakling that he was (he sounded like Mr Rogers), whether Kurds or the people of Iraq´s southern marshes (except and only as popular opinion in USA coerced him to some limitted degree). I still remeber with disgust the Newsweek feature as to how come the Gulf War ended as it did: because we were ashamed to bomb the highway out of Kuwait --- a public that would accept such twaddle deserves to get it in the neck, and now it has. Could Clinton have (unless he was the re-incarnation of FDR) mobilized the american puerile for the actions i recommend? --- not likely; consider the difficulty of getting USA to act in Jugoslavia, a matter that should have been dealt with (of course not by Bush, the egotistical namby pamby, in 1991 and 1992) in a few months and by the end of 1993, thus preventing Bosnian deaths on a scale that by comparison makes Sept 11 look like Disneyland. And the ONLY reason the blind eye was turned to Ruanda/Burundi was the gutlessness of the american puerile --- Clinton had to serve up only one spoonful at a time to the baby in the high-chair, and most important was Kosovo. torsdag 25. oktober 2001 19:47 Perhaps I should emphasize that this is a “lovers´ quarrel”, and I write as a “Dutch uncle” --- what I want is for USA generally to grow up; if you think bin Laden is bad, wait ´til you get bit by Mother Earth!!!!! The policy that says world ecology is less important than the economy of USA is the road to extinction. There is a difference between describing as best one can what one thinks has happened, and stating one´s own moral estimation as to what should have been done and why. If e g, we look at theVietnam War, we can ask what people mean, refering to USA´s intentions v v USA´s wishes: what may have been the agenda of Ike and LBJ and Nixon (putting aside the mystery of JFK) is unlikely to have been that of the American People considered as a nation with national desires --- if we assume the domino theory meant that what was important to USA was NOT Vietnam per se, but rather the dominoes down the line, then why could USA not have made a deal with Ho Chi Minh to have Cambodia remain as a neutral buffer state? So, now that people, after Dallas ´63, etc and up to and including Sept 11, 2001 plus the post office anthrax scandal, may be at last getting the message that our leaders are not to be relied upon in the realm of not-being-stupidly-incompetent, let us thoroughly examine the thought processes behind the smoke and mirrors, just as we have learned to challenge those of our previously sacrosanct parents. The first phase of any such analysis is to challenge the lies: what were we told at the time, vs what do we see now as really having happened or done? I am amused that now Moscow has abandoned the project of a naval base in Vietnam (Camran Bay). But would USSR have been able to get enuf rice from Vietnam to fend off bankruptcy? And was a friend of mine right in saying at the time, that LBJ was (intentionally) saving USA from internal political/social chaos along lines of Blacks vs Whites, by sending lots of Blacks off to war, wh ile on the other hand playing games with so-called “Great Society” legislation? And was part of the plan, to show USSR (yet again) that USA could control itself v v atomic weapons etc, in a perplexing military situation (demonstrating self control and dependability, and that what was truly important to USA was USSR? Indeed, on a deep insidious psychologicl level, USA eventually showed USSR that USA could survive the so-called defeat (could USSR do that?), or why not USSR risk similarly later on (i e, Afghanistan), and find, yo ho ho that USSR could not indeed survive such catastrophe. In the great tv series “Dynasty” it was called (by Fallon Carrington) “spitting in the ocean” --- USA is and was so immensely wealthy that USSR simply could not compete (especially with its insane economic system, not to mention ages of backwardness).

lørdag 17. november 2001 03:20 Establishment cannibalism includes the head of the norwegian car-drivers league saying its ok to use mobile fones while driving altho statistics show that even with fones not hand held accidents are fostered. 04:15 Consider that what with all those VIPs at UN this past week etc, airplane mechanics etc were (are) creamed for them, leaving the ordinary for flights to Caribbean ?????